Captivate vs Podbean

Price, free plan and alternatives, side by side

The comparison in short

Cheapest per year

Podbean

$144/yr

29% less than Captivate

Who has a free plan
  • Captivateno free plan
  • Podbeanhas a free plan
Easiest to rebuild

Captivate, Podbean

Worth subscribing

On price, Podbean wins. To start without paying, Podbean has a free plan.

Side-by-side comparison

APPLICATIONCaptivateAudio & videoPodbeanAudio & video
Monthly billing$19/moPersonal$17/moUnlimited Audio
Per year$204/yrannual plan · −11%$144/yrannual plan · −29%
Billing modelFlat subscriptionFlat subscription
Free tierno free tier5 hours/500 MB total storage, 100 GB bandwidth/month, 3 episodes/day, 100 MB/file and 20 episodes in the RSS feed
Additional costsThere is no per-download overage charge, but exceeding the plan's download limit for 2 consecutive months triggers a required upgrade; students, educational organizations, registered charities and nonprofits can receive 25% off after contacting support.Despite the word Unlimited, paid plans cap monthly uploads; extra podcasts and additional AI credits are sold separately at prices not posted publicly.
Can you rebuild it?Worth subscribingnot a true replacement; consolation build in one to two daysWorth subscribingnot a true replacement; consolation build in one to two days
Free alternatives—
Checked on10/20/202610/20/2026
Buy on the official siteBuy View app pageBuy View app page

The free plan compares up to 2 apps. Pro compares up to 4. See plans →

ProTotal cost over up to 3 years, for your teamWith Pro you see what each app costs over 1, 2 or 3 years for your team size and export the comparison as CSV or Markdown.Unlock with Pro →
Total cost over up to 3 years, for your team

With Pro you see what each app costs over 1, 2 or 3 years for your team size and export the comparison as CSV or Markdown.

Unlock with Pro

Also compare with

Direct rivals of the apps on this page, from the same category.

Prices from each app’s latest check; confirm on the official site before buying.