Orshot vs Zapier

Price, free plan and alternatives, side by side

The comparison in short

Cheapest per year

Zapier

$240/yr

38% less than Orshot

Who has a free plan
  • Orshothas a free plan
  • Zapierhas a free plan
Easiest to rebuild

Orshot, Zapier

With trade-offs

On price, Zapier wins.

Side-by-side comparison

APPLICATIONOrshotAutomationZapierAutomation
Monthly billing$39/moLaunch$29.99/moProfessional
Per year$390/yrannual plan · −17%$240/yrannual plan · −33%
Billing modelUsage-basedFlat subscription
Free tier30 render credits and 50 AI credits one time, 100 requests/minute, 1 workspace and 1 member100 tasks/month, 2-step Zaps, 1 seat, 15-minute polling, 2,500 table records/account, 3 views/table, 10 form pages and 5 MB maximum form upload
Additional costs1 image, PDF page or video second consumes 1 render credit. Pay-as-you-go overages are $36, $30 or $24 per 1,000 by tier; Social Publishing is a separate $12/month per connected social account.Pay-per-task overage is enabled by default on eligible paid plans. Some newer units cost multiple tasks: MCP calls use 2, Lead Router steps 5, AI actions can use 1/3/5 by model tier, and extended code uses 1 task per 30 seconds. Agents and Chatbots are separate products or add-ons.
Can you rebuild it?With trade-offsweekend to multi-dayWith trade-offsweekend
Free alternatives+1
Checked on10/20/202610/20/2026
Buy on the official siteBuy View app pageBuy View app page

The free plan compares up to 2 apps. Pro compares up to 4. See plans →

ProTotal cost over up to 3 years, for your teamWith Pro you see what each app costs over 1, 2 or 3 years for your team size and export the comparison as CSV or Markdown.Unlock with Pro →
Total cost over up to 3 years, for your team

With Pro you see what each app costs over 1, 2 or 3 years for your team size and export the comparison as CSV or Markdown.

Unlock with Pro

Also compare with

Direct rivals of the apps on this page, from the same category.

Prices from each app’s latest check; confirm on the official site before buying.